Muslim Woman Confessed To Beating Baby To Death, Guess What Offended Islam

You'd think that if someone confessed to beating a two year old child to death over four days leaving her with 55 separate injuries from head to toe there would be anger over the death and anger towards the person responsible. Not in Islam there isn't. In Islam, like usual, they have ignored the heinous crime of infanticide, ignored the fact that a child was systematically abused to death and instead focused their feigned outrage, like the perpetual cry baby victims that they are, towards the fact that this poor baby murderer had to take her rags off when having her mugshot taken.

Apparently not concerned about this child's death and the fact that his wife had confessed to killing her niece, Alaeddin Hadid, husband of the baby murderer Nour Hadid, said Orland Park police are "really going to be in big trouble" for releasing the photo of the confessed murderer to the press. Not as much trouble as your wife is in, pal.

Alaeddin added "It is against our religion; we do not do this in our culture". Obviously talking about removing the hijab, not about killing babies.

Another Muslim Uses Religion To Get Out Of Doing His Job

Common sense prevails as a British muslim cab driver was fined £300 for refusing to take a blind man and his dog - something he is required to do under the terms of his licence - On the grounds that carrying a dog, An animal considered unclean in islam, Is against his precious religion.

Of course, being from the most "honest" religion of all Mr Roshanmoniri, upon finding out that a complaint had been filed, went to his doctor and got a suspiciously convenient letter stating that he was allergic to dogs - something he apparently forgot to tell his blind passenger and instead went with the "it's against my religion" excuse.

here's an idea, It's not radical, But perhaps You should just do the fucking job you are being paid for and stop hiding behind your primitive desert myth when demanding special treatment.

Besides being illegal, denying a blind man a ride on the grounds that you don't like his dog is a pretty shitty thing to do and this guy should be completely ashamed of himself.

Muslims Want Muhammad Pictures Removed From Wikipedia

In another demonstration of how they want everybody to do as they say and follow their rules, offended muslims have started a petition to have Wikipedia remove images depicting their prophet Muhammad. The petition currently has 32,000 signatures

In Islam pictures or Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and other holly figures are not allowed, but on wikipedia they has published some pictures that are showing not only a body with white face but an image that has a complete face.. that is even not allowed by SHITAT fact of Islam.
i request all my brothers and sisters to sign this petition so we can tell wikipedia to remove them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad
specially this image
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Maome.jpg

See, The tolerant religion of islam wants only one thing. They want everybody to do as they say all of the time. If us infidels could just agree to that one small request, Everything would be fine.

What they don't realise is that the only people obliged to follow the rules of islam are muslims. They can invent whatever wacky rule they like, But what they can't do is demand everybody else abides by it.

Are they offended? probably not, Not really. But even if they are, So what? They are entitled to be offended. Just like i am entitled to be offended every time they demand that others change their behaviour to suite them.

Of course if we were to have a competition over who is offended more they would no doubt feel entitled to win because they are offended over disrespect to their religion, Which apparently trumps every other kind of offended.

Take Offence Now! Everyone's Doing It!

With the christian professional victims taking offence to the Golden Compass you may be feeling left out. what is there for us to be offended about? Well, If you are Atheist, Apart from the obvious, Not a lot. well, certainly nothing that will receive media coverage.

But if you are religious and feel left out there are a list of movies [*] that you can, And should, Be offended by. So what are you waiting for? take offence now and start stamping your feet!

'The Da Vinci Code' (2006)

Who was offended? Catholics
What was their beef? The Vatican, along with several Catholic groups around the world, objected strongly to the assertions made in the book and movie about the motivations of the Catholic Church in allegedly covering up a relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene.

'The Passion of the Christ' (2004)

Who was offended? Jews
What was their beef? Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" was one of the biggest hits of 2004. Its stark images of Jesus' crucifixion and the violence toward him, as well as villainous portrayals of many Jewish people, created a religious furor. Rabbis around the world said the film had the potential to transmit potent negative images, attitudes, stereotypes and caricatures about Jews and Judaism.

'September Dawn' (2006)

Who was offended? Mormons
What was their beef? "September Dawn" is described as a love story set against the backdrop of a 19th century massacre of a wagon train of Utah settlers. Though the massacre is documented, Mormons decry the portrayal of church members as murderers.

'Water' (2005)

Who was offended? Hindus
What was their beef? Shooting on the film, which depicts the plight of Hindu widows, was disrupted when fundamentalists and supporters of the Bharatiya Janata Party and its mentor, the Sangh Parivar, staged raucous protests.

'Submission' (2004)

Who was offended? Muslims
What was their beef? When Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, a descendent of Vincent van Gogh, released the 10-minute film "Submission," with its criticism of violence against women in Islamic society and its images of seminude actresses with passages from the Koran displayed on their bodies, he became the target of death threats. He shrugged them off, but on the morning of Nov. 2, 2004, he was killed in the streets of Amsterdam by Mohammed Bouyeri.

'Hollywood Buddha' (2003)

Who was offended? Buddhists
What was their beef? Director Philippe Caland's comedy about a struggling movie producer who buys a Buddha head and finds it changes his luck so enraged Buddhist monks in Sri Lanka and Thailand that they marched on government buildings, threatening to fast -- even to the point of death -- if the movie wasn't pulled from distribution.

'Bowfinger' (1999)

Who was offended? Scientologists
What was their beef? The Church of Scientology has gained a reputation for being litigious in protecting its reputation. "Bowfinger" screenwriter Steve Martin's riff on the religion, called MindHead in the movie, drew a more muted response. Makers of the movie (starring Martin and Eddie Murphy, pictured) downplayed the connection to Scientology, and Scientologists kept their protests to the pages of local newspapers, criticizing reviewers who drew any comparison to Scientology.

[HT: nmmng]

Red Bull Scrap Blasphemous TV Advert

Cry baby christians get their own way yet again by stamping their feet and claiming to be offended. This time offence was caused by something as harmless as an advert for the caffeinated energy drink Red Bull.

Father Marco Damanti wrote to the makers of the soft drink calling their advert a "blasphemous act" and demanded that the company scrap the advert, And as expected, They happily agreed.

The advert depicts the nativity with Mary, Joseph and jesus along with four wise men instead of three, The fourth is bearing a gift of red bull.

[Hat tip: FreeThinker]