... Good, Now i have your attention.
Like all good bloggers i keep a close eye on my visitor stats to see where my readers are coming from, who is linking to me and how they got here. Part of this obsession involves looking at referrals from search engines to find out what people have searched for before finding themselves here.
A few things have surprised me; like how well i rank for chimpanzee chromosome 13[search] or endogenous retrovirus prove evolution[search]. Now i know those phrases don't have much competition in terms of results, but i am up against some highly respected science journals, blogs and sites there. I think i rank well because both articles made the front page of digg and subsequently got a lot of backlinks.
The thing that has really surprised me though, and which i am less proud of, is how well i rank for penis sucking[search] and arm amputee porn[search].
Still, you never know, maybe someone somewhere will start out looking for amputee porn and end up becoming an atheist. That would really piss the christians off.
What, if any, funny, unrelated or outrageous search terms do people find your blog by?
January 30, 2009
Another "christian" Rapes A Child
A Canadian man who described himself as a pastor was sentenced Monday to five years in prison for sexually assaulting a 10-year-old girl he claims was his wife.
Daniel Cormier, 57, was convicted in October after members of the now-defunct Church of Downtown Montreal became suspicious of his relationship with the girl. Cormier, who led the church, has maintained he did nothing wrong when he married the girl, then 10 years old, in 1999 during a ceremony at his church.
"I would say that there's no remorse," prosecutor Anne-Andree Charette said outside the courtroom. "He just tried to find justifications." The girl, now 19, testified she was too young to grasp the concept of marriage but said she remembered the sexual abuse in vivid detail.
Cormier is currently on trial in another case where he is accused of sexually assaulting a 16-year-old girl — also during his time as a pastor.
He denies the accusation.
Well well well, it's almost become "not news worthy" when one of these con-men abuses their position of trust to abuse a child. It's almost as if we have come to expect these people to have some kind of sexual depravity, or at least a sex life contradictory to what they preach to others
January 26, 2009
Who Would Send Sir David Attenborough Hate Mail? Christians, Of Course.
"They tell me to burn in hell and good riddance," Sir David said during an interview with the Radio Times about his latest documentary on Charles Darwin and natural selection.
This year marks two centuries since Darwin's birth and 150 years since the groundbreaking On the Origin of Species was published.
Telling the magazine that he was also asked why he did not give "credit" to the Lord, Sir David continued: "They always mean beautiful things like hummingbirds. I always reply by saying that I think of a little child in East Africa with a worm burrowing through his eyeball. The worm cannot live in any other way, except by burrowing through eyeballs. I find that hard to reconcile with the notion of a divine and benevolent creator."
He said: "It never really occurred to me to believe in God - and I had nothing to rebel against, my parents told me nothing whatsoever. But I do remember looking at my headmaster delivering a sermon, a classicist, extremely clever... and thinking, he can't really believe all that, can he? How incredible!"
Sir David also said it was "terrible, terrible" when creationism and evolution were taught in schools as equivalent, alternative perspectives. "It's like saying that two and two equals four, but if you wish to believe it, it could also be five... Evolution is not a theory; it is a fact, every bit as much as the historical fact that William the Conqueror landed in 1066."
Speaking about the relationship between people and the rest of nature, Sir David said: "People say to me: 'What is a mosquito for? They're no good for anything!', The basic notion that the world is our oyster, that we have domination over all things, that they are here for us..." Asked where that view comes from, Sir David replied: "The Bible, of course. Genesis, chapter one."
This year marks two centuries since Darwin's birth and 150 years since the groundbreaking On the Origin of Species was published.
Telling the magazine that he was also asked why he did not give "credit" to the Lord, Sir David continued: "They always mean beautiful things like hummingbirds. I always reply by saying that I think of a little child in East Africa with a worm burrowing through his eyeball. The worm cannot live in any other way, except by burrowing through eyeballs. I find that hard to reconcile with the notion of a divine and benevolent creator."
He said: "It never really occurred to me to believe in God - and I had nothing to rebel against, my parents told me nothing whatsoever. But I do remember looking at my headmaster delivering a sermon, a classicist, extremely clever... and thinking, he can't really believe all that, can he? How incredible!"
Sir David also said it was "terrible, terrible" when creationism and evolution were taught in schools as equivalent, alternative perspectives. "It's like saying that two and two equals four, but if you wish to believe it, it could also be five... Evolution is not a theory; it is a fact, every bit as much as the historical fact that William the Conqueror landed in 1066."
Speaking about the relationship between people and the rest of nature, Sir David said: "People say to me: 'What is a mosquito for? They're no good for anything!', The basic notion that the world is our oyster, that we have domination over all things, that they are here for us..." Asked where that view comes from, Sir David replied: "The Bible, of course. Genesis, chapter one."
January 24, 2009
The Arrogance Of Christian Prayer
Christianity, While professing to be a religion of humility, is actually one of the most selfish, arrogant and narcissistic beliefs one could possibly hold.
On a regular basis christians claim that their god had answered their prayers and helped them get a raise, cured their dog of a trivial ailment or even, in what can be only described as ungratefulness, surgery which which was actually done by a dedicated professional who trained for years. Thank the surgeon you ungrateful asshole.
I was recently directed to a website where these so called "christians" post their answered prayers. let's have a look at what these parasites claim their god done for them - notice no amputees saying "thanks for the new leg, god!" and nobody saying "thanks for curing the 30% of pregnant women in Africa who are infected with HIV". Their god doesn't have time for crap like that, not with all the car keys he is helping people find, loans he is arranging and rental agreements he puts in place.
I looked for some time over these "answered prayers" and didn't see a single one that couldn't be described as selfish and trivial.
On a regular basis christians claim that their god had answered their prayers and helped them get a raise, cured their dog of a trivial ailment or even, in what can be only described as ungratefulness, surgery which which was actually done by a dedicated professional who trained for years. Thank the surgeon you ungrateful asshole.
I was recently directed to a website where these so called "christians" post their answered prayers. let's have a look at what these parasites claim their god done for them - notice no amputees saying "thanks for the new leg, god!" and nobody saying "thanks for curing the 30% of pregnant women in Africa who are infected with HIV". Their god doesn't have time for crap like that, not with all the car keys he is helping people find, loans he is arranging and rental agreements he puts in place.
Praise the Lord for the mighty things he has done.Over the past year I have asked for prayer for the financial problems of my family. My son-in-law went back to work today and my sister that has been struggling with back problems and couldn't work ,has a part time job at home.
just a couple days ago i asked to be prayed for that i would find a home of my own for me and my kids ...i just signed a rental agreement for a 3 bedroom house in a nice area with a huge yard for my boys to play in
i was praying fr a raise , to reach my goals to get the raise, and to get a credit on my utility bill, and voila, god does answer prayers, Thanks be to God Jesus mary the angels saints and my mom for all blessings and intervention. these were truly miracles
please pray that God's doors of prosperity are opened to Jacquie, Brady, Harry, Ritchie and Erin. I ask prayers that funds will come erin by the end of January 2009. I also ask that Jacquie's house be fixed, Harry find a job and Brady have no more car problems and be surrounded with happiness and good fortune thank you
Thank you GOD for allowing me the chance to start over. Thank you for helping me to get my drivers license and for sending me the money I needed to pay my bills this month.
thanks to the almighty Lord for getting a loan sanctioned for me at the time of needBy now you should get the picture. These so called "christians" mostly pray for money, For themselves. Anyone with even a shred of decency would be too ashamed to make it known that they pray for such selfish, trivial things.
I looked for some time over these "answered prayers" and didn't see a single one that couldn't be described as selfish and trivial.
January 23, 2009
Pope Gets Youtube Channel
Pope Benedict, you know the guy, ex-hitler youth, is set to become one of the oldest youtube "celebs" after setting up the Vatican channel, phew, finally.
The channel is to feature daily video clips, each of about 2 minutes long, showing the behind the scenes life of the world richest con-man (oh joy) and sermons (yay).
I hope the first video is explaining how the move to internetify (it's a word) catholicism fits in with the Vatican's previous condemnation of the internet.
The channel is to feature daily video clips, each of about 2 minutes long, showing the behind the scenes life of the world richest con-man (oh joy) and sermons (yay).
I hope the first video is explaining how the move to internetify (it's a word) catholicism fits in with the Vatican's previous condemnation of the internet.
Muslim Says: Beat Women Who Wont Let You Rape Them
A Melbourne Islamic cleric has told his male followers they can force their wives to have sex and hit them if they are disobedient.
Coburg's self-styled cleric, Samir Abu Hamza, said despite Australian rape laws it was impossible for a man to rape his wife even if she refused to have sex with him.
"If the husband was to ask her for a sexual relationship and she is preparing the bread on the stove she must leave it and come and respond to her husband, she must respond" Mr Hamza told his male followers on the video sermon.
He then went on to describe how men should respond to a disobedient wife by saying "After you have advised them [not to be disobedient] for a long, long time then you smack them, you beat them" and that "This is just to shape them up, shape up woman"
When asked to explain his views Mr Hamza, In predictable fashion, Blamed the "zionist media".
cue the excuses from my little muslim readers.
(by the way, Don't bother telling me it's "unislamic", Not unless you are first going to tell Mr Hamza, the cleric concerned, how it's unislamic. All i'm concerned with is the fact that this filthy piece of shit is advising muslims men in a civilised country to rape and beat women.)
Coburg's self-styled cleric, Samir Abu Hamza, said despite Australian rape laws it was impossible for a man to rape his wife even if she refused to have sex with him.
"If the husband was to ask her for a sexual relationship and she is preparing the bread on the stove she must leave it and come and respond to her husband, she must respond" Mr Hamza told his male followers on the video sermon.
He then went on to describe how men should respond to a disobedient wife by saying "After you have advised them [not to be disobedient] for a long, long time then you smack them, you beat them" and that "This is just to shape them up, shape up woman"
When asked to explain his views Mr Hamza, In predictable fashion, Blamed the "zionist media".
cue the excuses from my little muslim readers.
(by the way, Don't bother telling me it's "unislamic", Not unless you are first going to tell Mr Hamza, the cleric concerned, how it's unislamic. All i'm concerned with is the fact that this filthy piece of shit is advising muslims men in a civilised country to rape and beat women.)
January 22, 2009
Church Tells Flock To Sit In A Cupboard
Recognising that their flock mostly consists of socially inept, mentally ill loners the church of England has published a book telling it's followers to create a "prayer den" in the cupboard under the stairs and instructs them (adults!) to sit in it when life gets too much.
In the book called Love Life Live Lent, which gives worshippers ideas for how to mark the 40-day period before Easter, believers are told about the "stress of modern life" and given ideas about how to create a sanctum of solice. Three of the suggestions are sitting in the cupboard under the stairs (which is probably the creepiest thing i have ever heard), Sitting on a shelf or creating "prayer den" using "furniture and blankets" (something which i believe 5 year olds refer to as "a fort").
Followers are also instructed to decorate them with "pebbles, shells and feathers" (why?)
A part of my loves the idea of going round someones house and seeing them get in a cupboard, sitting on a shelf or peeking out of their little fort, Just for comedy value.
Tell me I'm not the only one who finds this infantile and creepy.
In the book called Love Life Live Lent, which gives worshippers ideas for how to mark the 40-day period before Easter, believers are told about the "stress of modern life" and given ideas about how to create a sanctum of solice. Three of the suggestions are sitting in the cupboard under the stairs (which is probably the creepiest thing i have ever heard), Sitting on a shelf or creating "prayer den" using "furniture and blankets" (something which i believe 5 year olds refer to as "a fort").
Followers are also instructed to decorate them with "pebbles, shells and feathers" (why?)
A part of my loves the idea of going round someones house and seeing them get in a cupboard, sitting on a shelf or peeking out of their little fort, Just for comedy value.
Tell me I'm not the only one who finds this infantile and creepy.
Tags:
books,
christianity,
UK
Obama: First President Not To Swear On The Bible
After the initial cock-up on Inauguration day where Chief Justice John Roberts tripped over what is arguably the most important collection of words in American history - prompting Obama to do the same - it was decided that the oath should be taken again. This time behind closed doors amidst a select few reporters and officials in the white house map room.
The retaking of the oath went without a hitch and Obama was successfully sworn in, a second time, as president of the United States Of America. But this time he done it without his left hand on the bible.
Obviously this is not that much of a big deal and the second taking of the oath was just, as the white house lawyer put it, "out of the abundance of caution". But it is refreshing to see that Obama doesn't attach much important to religious pomp and ceremony.
it is not known if "so help me god" was crow-barred in at the end like it usually is which renders an otherwise poetic and powerful oath jitterly and awkward.
The retaking of the oath went without a hitch and Obama was successfully sworn in, a second time, as president of the United States Of America. But this time he done it without his left hand on the bible.
Obviously this is not that much of a big deal and the second taking of the oath was just, as the white house lawyer put it, "out of the abundance of caution". But it is refreshing to see that Obama doesn't attach much important to religious pomp and ceremony.
it is not known if "so help me god" was crow-barred in at the end like it usually is which renders an otherwise poetic and powerful oath jitterly and awkward.
January 19, 2009
Study Finds Church Goers Least Honest And More Likely To Steal
For a long time i have suspected that those who profess to have some kind of enhanced morality are probably the most deceitful, and now i have a study to back up my suspicions. Not that i have ever needed a study to support my theory
In the latest study measuring honesty, researchers in Austria set up an experiment in which people were able to buy a news paper by dropping money in to a box and taking a newspaper. The newspapers were hung beneath the box in a plastic bag and there was nothing physically stopping people taking a paper without depositing the 60c required.
What the researchers did was put one newspaper in the bag and waited for someone to take it. if the person deposited some money the box was emptied and the money counted. The person was then stopped further up the street and asked to participate in an interview in which they were asked questions without being told that the interview was in any way connected to the newspaper purchase. The amount they paid could then be cross referenced with the answers they gave in the interview.
Unsurprisingly most people didn't pay the 60c asked for and the average paid was only 26c, But it gets really interesting when we start looking at how much below the average was paid by people of different groups. Shockingly, well, not that shockingly, those who professed to being a "church goer" paid on average 22.13c less than the average of 26c, which works out at only 3.77c each, 56.33c less than the asking price of 60c.
I don't know their god calls it, But i call it theft and a demonstration that they are either utter hypocrites or don't actually believe in this god shit any more than i do.
[HT: friendly atheist]
In the latest study measuring honesty, researchers in Austria set up an experiment in which people were able to buy a news paper by dropping money in to a box and taking a newspaper. The newspapers were hung beneath the box in a plastic bag and there was nothing physically stopping people taking a paper without depositing the 60c required.
What the researchers did was put one newspaper in the bag and waited for someone to take it. if the person deposited some money the box was emptied and the money counted. The person was then stopped further up the street and asked to participate in an interview in which they were asked questions without being told that the interview was in any way connected to the newspaper purchase. The amount they paid could then be cross referenced with the answers they gave in the interview.
Unsurprisingly most people didn't pay the 60c asked for and the average paid was only 26c, But it gets really interesting when we start looking at how much below the average was paid by people of different groups. Shockingly, well, not that shockingly, those who professed to being a "church goer" paid on average 22.13c less than the average of 26c, which works out at only 3.77c each, 56.33c less than the asking price of 60c.
I don't know their god calls it, But i call it theft and a demonstration that they are either utter hypocrites or don't actually believe in this god shit any more than i do.
[HT: friendly atheist]
MPs Want To Ban Atheist Bus Advert
I woke up today thinking i had been transported to Iran as i read the news that British MPs are trying to have the atheist bus poster which says "there's probably no god" banned on the grounds that it may make christians and muslims feel "embarrassed and uncomfortable" (grow a pair and deal with it you sniveling cry-babies).
I thought Britain prided it's self on it's freedom of speech? I thought we lived in a country where people were allowed to have different views, and voice those views. Or is it as i suspect, and how it usually is with the religious, that people can only voice views if they are the same views as the religious.
Here is a list of MPs abusing their position in order to censor descent.
Gregory Campbell - campbellg@parliament.uk
Bob Spink - spinkr@parliament.uk
Sir Nicholas Winterton - mcatory@btconnect.com
Jim Dobbin - Unknown
David Drew - Unknown
Ann Cryer - Unknown
Marsha Singh - Unknown
Lee Scott - scottle@parliament.uk
David Simpson - davidsimpson@upperbannd.u.p.co.uk
Ann Winterton - annwintertonmp@parliament.uk
The time when religious views are given specials concessions has to come to an end. If christian groups can advertise a website which states that disbelievers will burn in hell why on earth can't atheists have one that says it probably wont happen?
A part of me wants the atheist bus advert banned, Either by the advertising standards authority on the grounds that the claims can't be proven or by wishy-washy MPs on the grounds that it may offend - Imagine the leverage that kind of president would give us. We would practically be able to outlaw religion overnight.
People opposing this advert are treading on very thin ice and they should be very careful when it comes to their reasons for opposing it, Or they may find the same logic coming back and biting them on their arse.
Thanks to nullifidian
I thought Britain prided it's self on it's freedom of speech? I thought we lived in a country where people were allowed to have different views, and voice those views. Or is it as i suspect, and how it usually is with the religious, that people can only voice views if they are the same views as the religious.
Here is a list of MPs abusing their position in order to censor descent.
Gregory Campbell - campbellg@parliament.uk
Bob Spink - spinkr@parliament.uk
Sir Nicholas Winterton - mcatory@btconnect.com
Jim Dobbin - Unknown
David Drew - Unknown
Ann Cryer - Unknown
Marsha Singh - Unknown
Lee Scott - scottle@parliament.uk
David Simpson - davidsimpson@upperbannd.u.p.co.uk
Ann Winterton - annwintertonmp@parliament.uk
The time when religious views are given specials concessions has to come to an end. If christian groups can advertise a website which states that disbelievers will burn in hell why on earth can't atheists have one that says it probably wont happen?
A part of me wants the atheist bus advert banned, Either by the advertising standards authority on the grounds that the claims can't be proven or by wishy-washy MPs on the grounds that it may offend - Imagine the leverage that kind of president would give us. We would practically be able to outlaw religion overnight.
People opposing this advert are treading on very thin ice and they should be very careful when it comes to their reasons for opposing it, Or they may find the same logic coming back and biting them on their arse.
Thanks to nullifidian
Tags:
Atheism,
Free Speech,
UK
January 16, 2009
Christian Refuses To Drive Atheist Bus
Ron Heather, a 62 year old christian driver for the First bus operator, Downed tools and went home this week after flat out refusing to do what he is being paid for and drive a bus which happened to have the atheist bus poster declaring "There's probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life" on the side.
He told his managers that the bus advert went against his faith. Shame his faith plays a bigger role than his work ethic or sense of duty.
Mr Heather, While no doubt stamping his feet and foaming at the mouth, said "There would be no way buses would be able to drive around with an anti-Muslim message like that on the side mentioning Allah. There would be uproar" while being completely oblivious to the fact that allah is included in this message and it is in no way specifically about his particular god. Why do the religious always assume atheism singles them out?
The watchdog is now considering whether to investigate the campaign on the grounds that it is offensive, or that its central claim about God's existence cannot be substantiated, Which would be absolutely brilliant as it would allow atheist groups to challenge religious posters on the same grounds. I would love nothing more than religious organisations to be prevented from advertising on the grounds that their claims have no basis in reality.
The atheist bus campaign set out aiming to raise £5000 to put posters on a few buses in London, but after receiving great support and donations totalling £140,000 they were able to vastly scale up their efforts to raise awareness.
Hanne Stinson, chief executive of the British Humanist Association, which is running the campaign, said "I have difficulty understanding why people with particular religious beliefs find the expression of a different sort of beliefs to be offensive."
He told his managers that the bus advert went against his faith. Shame his faith plays a bigger role than his work ethic or sense of duty.
Mr Heather, While no doubt stamping his feet and foaming at the mouth, said "There would be no way buses would be able to drive around with an anti-Muslim message like that on the side mentioning Allah. There would be uproar" while being completely oblivious to the fact that allah is included in this message and it is in no way specifically about his particular god. Why do the religious always assume atheism singles them out?
The watchdog is now considering whether to investigate the campaign on the grounds that it is offensive, or that its central claim about God's existence cannot be substantiated, Which would be absolutely brilliant as it would allow atheist groups to challenge religious posters on the same grounds. I would love nothing more than religious organisations to be prevented from advertising on the grounds that their claims have no basis in reality.
The atheist bus campaign set out aiming to raise £5000 to put posters on a few buses in London, but after receiving great support and donations totalling £140,000 they were able to vastly scale up their efforts to raise awareness.
Hanne Stinson, chief executive of the British Humanist Association, which is running the campaign, said "I have difficulty understanding why people with particular religious beliefs find the expression of a different sort of beliefs to be offensive."
Tags:
Atheism,
christianity,
Equality,
London,
UK
January 15, 2009
The Christian God Doesn't Like Themed Zoo Exhibits, Apparently
The Kansas City Zoo has received a complaint about Buddha statues in an Asian-themed area.
David Engle, of Overland Park, Kan., complained after visiting the zoo on Sunday. He said it's "phenomenal to me" that the zoo would put up two smiling statues of Buddha when "we can't have a cross or a nativity scene on public property." Engle, who said he is Christian, called the statues idolatry and "infuriating to God."
Despite being a cry baby and a hypocrite Engle has completely missed the point. Religious things are allowed on public property, For instance in museums, historical exhibits and, In this case, A themed zoo exhibition featuring animals indigenous to Asia. What isn't allowed is the promotion of religion.
David Engle, of Overland Park, Kan., complained after visiting the zoo on Sunday. He said it's "phenomenal to me" that the zoo would put up two smiling statues of Buddha when "we can't have a cross or a nativity scene on public property." Engle, who said he is Christian, called the statues idolatry and "infuriating to God."
Despite being a cry baby and a hypocrite Engle has completely missed the point. Religious things are allowed on public property, For instance in museums, historical exhibits and, In this case, A themed zoo exhibition featuring animals indigenous to Asia. What isn't allowed is the promotion of religion.
January 10, 2009
The Worst Thing Ever Done In The Name Of Jesus
This is a clip from an L.A. public access show called the "Junior Christian Science Bible Lesson Show", in which two men who have absolutely no musical ability, and apparently not even a basic understanding of how a guitar works, are joined by a woman who is inspired to act like a stripper every-time she hears singing and two puppets who are spookily inanimate, even for puppets. Together they sing the lyrically bankrupt song "i love christmas" while being completely oblivious as to when their show is supposed to finish.
January 07, 2009
We All Agree Self-Harm Is A Result Of Mental Illness, Right?
"Self-harm develops when the child who has become attached to those who have inflicted pain and suffering maintains that attachment by inflicting pain on himself."
"self-harm behavior is usually regarded as symptomatic of serious mental illness, often associated with a history of childhood trauma such as abuse or neglect."
"self-harm behavior is usually regarded as symptomatic of serious mental illness, often associated with a history of childhood trauma such as abuse or neglect."
January 06, 2009
Religulous [full movie]
All 1 hour 40 minutes of Bill Maher's documentary "Religulous" in which he mocks, criticises and deconstructs primitive desert death cults and spells out, in plain English, what religion will ultimately do to humankind.
Man Of God Clutches Bible As He Gets 90 Years For Child Molestation
An Anaheim pastor, who had videotaped himself molesting a 13-year-old parishioner in a church office, cried and clutched a Bible behind his back Monday as he was led from a courtroom in handcuffs after pleading guilty to 34 felony sex counts.
Raul Rosas Hernandez, 44, was sentenced by Superior Court Judge Francisco Briseno to 90 years in prison after he admitted molesting four girls and one boy over a 10-year span beginning in 1996.
In an earlier court appearance several of this disgusting hypocrites congregation turned up to "support him". Hernandez cried and clutched his silly little book as the sentence was read out.
It was reported at one point in the tape showing him nude and molesting a child the phone rang and he had the cheek to answer it with the phrase "god bless you" and later went on to show him giving a sermon on blasphemy.
I am starting to come to the conclusion that these disgusting sub humans only take these jobs as a way to abuse children or hide their homosexuality.
If one were a member of a social club or political group with this much child abuse associated with it there would be outrage. when it's done by a "man of god", though, their fans turn up to show their support.
Raul Rosas Hernandez, 44, was sentenced by Superior Court Judge Francisco Briseno to 90 years in prison after he admitted molesting four girls and one boy over a 10-year span beginning in 1996.
In an earlier court appearance several of this disgusting hypocrites congregation turned up to "support him". Hernandez cried and clutched his silly little book as the sentence was read out.
It was reported at one point in the tape showing him nude and molesting a child the phone rang and he had the cheek to answer it with the phrase "god bless you" and later went on to show him giving a sermon on blasphemy.
I am starting to come to the conclusion that these disgusting sub humans only take these jobs as a way to abuse children or hide their homosexuality.
If one were a member of a social club or political group with this much child abuse associated with it there would be outrage. when it's done by a "man of god", though, their fans turn up to show their support.
January 04, 2009
How Does The "Religion Of Peace" Respond To Criticism? With Threats Of Child Rape And Murder
As i was looking through some old videos made by Pat Condell, atheist and critic of islam, I heard him mention the feedback page on his website where he posts some of the more, Let's say, "fruity" responses he has gotten from some of the more hysterical primitives of islam.
So what do we expect from the "religion of peace"? Condolences? Good wishes? Forgiveness? nope, We get threats of murder and what can only be described as sadistic, paedophilic fantasies.
here is a selection of the comments left for pat by followers of the "religion of peace".
With all this fanatical ranting i'm surprised if they still find time to beat their wives or mutilate their children's genitals.
Now i expect muslims to post criticising not those of their number making such disgusting remarks, but me for highlighting it.
Religion of peace... yeah, right.
So what do we expect from the "religion of peace"? Condolences? Good wishes? Forgiveness? nope, We get threats of murder and what can only be described as sadistic, paedophilic fantasies.
here is a selection of the comments left for pat by followers of the "religion of peace".
u son of a hoe ur mama shouldve aborted u when u were in her womb,if she hadnt and i waz alive dat time i would punched her right dere so u couldve died... FUCK UUUUUUU!!!!!
why don’t you come suck my big dick asshole i would like to rape your whole family too if u got one…you will rot in hell grandpa
why don't you kill yourself white bastard? or do you want me to do it?
do you have a white daughter to rape and molest?
or are you scared your number is decreasing you redneck?
u suck
you'll die a slow painful death you motherfucker. Assholes like you have
made us Muslims stronger. fuck u old bitch.
With all this fanatical ranting i'm surprised if they still find time to beat their wives or mutilate their children's genitals.
Now i expect muslims to post criticising not those of their number making such disgusting remarks, but me for highlighting it.
Religion of peace... yeah, right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)